Now we have the solution to the problems of crime, drugs, violence, prostitution and all you find the bad in the dictionary, simply create a curfew for young people under age and everything will be solved! Had to be here in Brazil right? You did not see, do not know, not heard or do not want to know? Some of our cities contradictory, unfair and perverse country are adopting a curfew for young people under age as a way to discipline them, rule them and fight crime according to some judges (and even without fame Syndrome legal pop stars) of our country. They argue that crime is directly linked to youth, it does not disagree, but put the couple as the main culprit of these facts, many studies showing the population and tables with indices of increased violence, child prostitution, drug use and criminality in general. It is easy to argue with numbers so expressive, genuine and convince the public that measures restrictive of rights as they are good for society. Yet these data do not reveal and punish the real culprits, since it is the government (under the existing system) to provide quality education, health, safety, housing, income, transport, recreation and welfare for citizens not to cause social distortions such as those common to the Brazilian people. Also included in this package of alleged perpetrators in the dock, the parents who have the role to guide their children about the world we live in, and not delegate that responsibility to the state, since those who send young people and influences the values and first social behaviors are the parents or the family circle, so that it creates is rather a portion of guilt (whether good or bad) in social actions of young people.
The cities that have adopted this measure hideous and disgusting to the point that it finds are: St Stephen (BA), Ipecaetá (BA), Antonio Cardoso (BA), Taperoá (PB), Livramento (GA), Assumption (GA), Arcos (MG), Pompeii (MG), Patos de Minas (MG), Itabirito (MG), Fernandópolis (SP), Meridian (SP), Macedonia (SP), Pedranópolis (SP), Solteira Island (SP), Itapura (SP ) and Mirassol (SP). The most impressive of all are the justifications of distorted and biased judges who implemented these processes dictatorial and backward. Their Hitler's are known

juiz José Brandão Neto (BA)

, juiz Iano Miranda dos Anjos (PB),

juiz Joamar Gomes Vieira Nunes (MG)

e o não menos “féla da putzkiparilda” Fernando Antônio de Lima (SP).

To cite as an example of measures to protect them as anachronistic and worthy of a "Fuck off!" In loud and clear, to expose some of these comments "jagunços the law." To judge Joamar Gomes Vieira Nunes (MG), young people need permission from parents and bracelets (only bring lack of dog collar!) Of identification to be on the streets after the time stipulated by him, and adds that the ordinances that restrict the activities for children and adolescents due to the time based on Article 227 of the Federal Constitution and Article 249 of ECA (Statute of the Child and Adolescent), it is necessary to urgently amend the articles!; We paraibano Judge Iano Miranda dos Anjos , says he took the decision based on various processes that deal in secrecy of justice and involving underage persons and other actions with complaints of illegal acts performed by children and adolescents. He added that the situation of public security in the three municipalities which declared a curfew is extremely worrying. "The framework of security is chaotic. I met with the councilmen and suggested to establish a municipal law governing this issue. Meanwhile, the ordinance will remain in force. "And finally the judge of the land of axé, José Brandão Neto, stating that his initiative aims to prevent situations of risk to minors, and supports the idea that the courts should interfere in the social issues and not only judge the facts after they occur (ie, before and after judging based on visions and laws elitist). "Parents are applauding me," says (no doubt).
In further analysis we can see that the cities that were subject to "lock juvenile" are small, easy to social control and domination through the use of force State / legal, so it is much less cumbersome for the "leaders" of these localities join bus ducts and questionable taste of the real culprits to blame for all this, which again passed the failure of government on youth, as practiced by the public policies they do not match the reality and not solve the these local problems, not assuming the administration of the state to blame for social failure. A measure of this size being imposed on a capital or in any Brazilian city of more words, it is difficult to sustain, since there would be demonstrations in disgust and disagreement in this dictatorial attitude. As for the infamous comments of the judge Iano Miranda dos Anjos the talk that the security is chaotic and suggested to establish a municipal law governing this issue, only reinforces the guilt and incompetence of judges and politicians in developing good deeds for the good social, because instead of creating educational projects that trace the intellectual development, critical and cultural youth, they have laws and useless idiots who feed the growing marginalization of children and adolescents. The Neandertal José Brandão Neto released the following pearl typical Sophists demagogues "Parents are applauding me," and would not be different, since it established the failure of government to deal with social issues most critical and emerging, they directly reflect inside the house of each family of low purchasing power of residents and neighborhoods, ie, young, son junkie, thief and who commits various acts unlawful. Parents not taking more voice and authority (not that this is good) to stop the acts of young offenders "delinquents" by which they become liabilities, as receptive to the idea of the state to control the lives of their children, but not completely blame the archaic attitude that since they are also victims of a repressive state, manipulative and biased that they are provided education has critical / cultural, thus generating more alienated a generation, lost and without sense. So quietly, the curfew is being implemented in the Brazilian cities with the approval of the majority of poor Brazilians, who will be most adversely affected with this measure stupid.
Although the majority of research and figures indicate that juvenile delinquency originates from the poorer classes, recently set up a new class of offenders with affluent. But where is the justification for young people has no reason (apparently) to enter the crime they doing this? The frequent complaints of them cover the emotional, sentimental and emotional, as being owner of material goods is not enough to remove them from crime and drugs, not because these parents are at home and willing to provide care and attention. Are parents who delegate responsibility to school to complete the development of their children, because they believe (mostly) who have the financial power to pay for good institutions of education are free of "problem". This is a serious mistake and that generates big traumas in a child or teenager, why not find emotional support at home this couple will look first at the supply, since they do not have a good sense of reference and that is love, the affection, the affection he enters the head at first he found affective relationship, whether married or not. There is the danger that lives, as a young "drunk" by this new feeling that the hosts and gives pleasure, do not hesitate to commit the several acts (good or bad) on behalf of that new experience in such cases only left twisting or ask the god that the person is when the influence of good character, as if the opposite can cause great damage to this young man.
If there are difficulties for young people of privileged classes in distancing itself from crime, what will the lack of classes often than not have consumer products (one of the plagues of the world) are victims of emotional neglect / family? A simplistic analysis of facts by the "lords of justice" and how the public, only increases the level of crime in the long term, since start of the repressive actions of the young collection of streets bear fruit, though not very hard, because that "bird is not happy in cages", so there is more anger and subversões the "prisoners home," and couple who already knows what I'm talking about. It is stupid to measures that will end with a crime, if it were the case, countries like the U.S. which has the form of control of crime the death penalty would have more criminals in its territory, but what you see on the news or other time is a serial killer who enters a school killing everyone there. What I mean is that to reach a level of world less violent, less drugs, less crime and social ills that we provide and meet the basic needs of young people by giving them more education (education free of dogma and educational moorings) , of true health, sports and leisure. Children and teenagers also need more support, protection, monitoring, dialogue, affection and love from their parents, rather than expensive gifts and extravagant. No more outsourcing the education of children!
Another major contradiction in this whole story is that these cities the curfew shall be suspended for the Jerk, Day of cities and Christmas. I understand ... then mean that there is no commemorative dates in violence, prostitution, crime and all the evils listinha they were talking about? It is interesting to know that those hours young people are conditioned as potential criminals or devoid of ethical conduct. Is that possible that delinquent youths dates instantly develop ethical and moral sense or are potential consumers who heat the local shops? The money speaks always highest right? What about young people working during the night to help the family income? They would also fit in the stereotype of potential criminals created by the judges? Of course, since young people are "out of hours" and point! Ladies judges who earn more than twenty thousand reais a month, know that there are families in our huge and genocidal country that depend on the help of their young children to eat and to stay alive, as the dominant way of our country is not its role to provide good wages and working parents of alleged criminals. And just to remind you, the decision to hurt the young collection of Chapter I of the Magna Carta. When young people drink and use drugs the night is because many adults is behind selling to them, if there is involvement with crime is because the state and parents are neglecting guidance, love, culture, sport, leisure, affection, love and education. Often the violence against young people is in their own home, where the family abuse, rape and lead to crime in these cases, the only moments of happiness, relief and peace for them is on the street with friends, find refuge . I come with all this verborragia and corja fallacy of false and hypocritical moralists, stating that the couple is the pivot of this whole story and that he is who should pay for mistakes, failures and decay of the current system. If age is synonymous with good conduct, the political dinosaurs of our country would have turned the country into a paradise (a really Sarney?). Parents need to have a more open dialogue with their children so that they create for themselves the concept of time, so when there is no repression and guidance stipulation of time that the street should be discussed by both parties, young people develop more respect for their parents and therefore common sense, without having to resort to taxation.
Where to deploy curfew in the country begin the biggest hood rat, offenders, criminals who are here as Maluf's, MA's, Squid, FHC and Agrippina's life, together with all the lair of the elite economic, legal and Brazilian politics. Then we would see it reduce crime, because at least they could not plan the falcatruas and roubalheiras night. I ask you, is that the curfew is the solution to social ills or worsening the problem? Actions such as these dictatorial nature makes us remember and live a little in 1964. The recovery of fragments of dictatorship does not sounds good, I suspect that the real reason that this curfew is to reduce the high rates of violence, drugs, and related crimes in our cities. In my opinion it only serves as background for attempts and experiments with new forms masked to print more control over the oppressed and laity. We can not let it become a fashion in the Country! If you are a resident of any of those cities that already dominates the curfew, create movements among the young (who are primarily affected) and who wish to give force to combat such attitudes, while still not suffering the violence of judges , are always with their "anti" linked and updated to not allow the deployment of despicable and disgusting attitudes of abuse of power. Until next time and be with God!

Regurgitate BY: Márcio "pygmy"



Articles cited in the text

(CF) Article 227 - It is the duty of the family, society and the State to ensure children and adolescents, with absolute priority, the right to life, health, nutrition, education, leisure, the professionalism, culture , dignity, respect, freedom and family and community living, and make them safe from all forms of neglect, discrimination, exploitation, violence, cruelty and oppression.

(ECA) Rule 249. Failure, malicious or guiltily, the duties inherent in the home due to power or guardianship or custody, as well as determination of the judicial authority or Guardianship Council: Penalty - fine of three to twenty reference wages, subject to a double in case of recurrence.

.