Meat or vegetable?

Lately has been proliferando in underground people fans vegetarianism, many why do you really believe in that food education or conduct, others just by modismo. However, several aspects of vegetarianism are not limited to only the issue of healthy eating, going beyond that, as the rights of animals. Vegetarian is someone who feeds basically grains, seeds, plants, cereals and fruit. With or without the use of dairy and eggs. Vegetarians exclude consumption of all kinds of animal meat, bovine, swine, goats, fish, birds etc.
The peculiarities and differences that exist in countless green movement, since vegetarians are not all equal. The ovolactovegetarianos, for example, do not eat meat of any kind, however consume eggs, milk and its derivatives. When we listen to on the day to day someone really is vegetarian, this is the diet followed by it; lactovegetarianos religious issues must be greater number group, since in southern India predominates this vegetarian profile, but in all parts of the world or almost all, we can find fans that diet without being under the influence of religion. Like good vegetarian they don't eat meat, but the dairy products are welcome, but the egg consumption by practitioners, abominado per second they contain “ vibration ” life; the well-known and drawn in scene underground called vegans are quite radical, because i do not eat anything of animal origin, this includes also since the meat as eggs, milk, honey, silk, wool, leather etc. Veganismo não é ser só vegetariano, configura-se em uma ideologia baseada nos direitos dos animais, e que lutam pela inclusão destes na sociedade, por este motivo não gostam de vincular sua ideologia a simples definição de dieta vegetariana; existe um grupo que é visto pelos vegetarianos fieis como falsos vegetarianos, que são os semi-vegetarianos, essa aversão dos demais grupos aos ditos pseudos-consumidores do verde advêm do fato de que os “semi” agregam a sua dieta o consumo de carne de peixes e aves, em geral esse grupo preocupa-se apenas com sua saúde e não com a questão animal; o crudivorismo chega a ser perigoso, pois os adeptos só consomem vegetais crus, o leite por vezes é presente, contudo excluem os grãos da dieta acarretando em um déficit de proteína e ferro, o que pode causar a desnutrição; os frugivoristas sofrem uma deficiência enorme no organismo pela falta de proteínas e minerais, já que sua dieta é à base de frutas, sementes, castanhas e grãos diversos, pois acreditam que comer folhas, caules e raízes é um ato de violência aos vegetais, com isso não machucam e nem matam as plantas e consomem apenas o que elas “permitem” comer.

After this brief explained about the different groups of vegetarians, open the discussion on the ethical issue that they both emphasize. It is laudable pullets animal vegetarian ', because only we humans have a brain developed enough to buscarmos and question our right to live unlike irrational animals (sometimes men seem more irrational that successfully) that cannot do this. The video, pamphlets, crass and every form of dissemination used to disseminate the philosophy of vegetarians animal activists are well informed, informative and enlightening, but there's always anyone more radical and extreme of the transfer of its concept of life, to create conflicts with the manner in which expresses or imposes its truth. I am not in favour or against anyone who eats meat, each makes your choice of who wants to eat, however we who are carnivores usually have a sloppy posture and disposed of as to what happens in the process of production of meat, derivatives etc.
There are studies that suggest that man is historically carnivorous and others who have their origin is herbívora, but science is highly volatile and tendentious, so we cannot in arresting the simplistic and unilateral analyses, since the query from several sources in a more consistent basic knowledge. I want to show that there the carnivores or vegetarians if port as owners of truth, and there is scope for several conclusions regarding the human food source.
But at one point vegetarians activists are entirely certain, because the treatment of animals to slaughterhouses, abatedouros and extremante cruel and refrigerators are going to be unwelcome macabre the process of production of steak we eat every day (or almost). Two documentaries familiar vegetarians and younger are ” and “ “ earthlings (documentary) meat is weak ”, these show the reality of various processes which animals spend until you come to our dishes. The strongest arguments and frequent Carnivora that vegetarians are of little consequence the lives of plants (with the exception of frugivoristas), since kill plants for food and it is a truth. Vegetarian also is assigned to the indirect neglects regarding the killing of animals native wild (as small rodents, snakes, insects, passarinhos etc.) in the fields that are opened to Plantar plants, a great example can be seen here in Brazil in soy plantations faraônicas, where hectares and more hectares of forests are devastated for use agrônomo. Ends while zero zero the scoreboard, because against facts no arguments. Justify some vegetarians is that plants do not feel pain, since they don't have a nervous system, for this reason may be eaten without any remorse. But then comes the question that the majority of vegetarians not eat meat because animals feel pain and why are dó them? If any, are being hypocritical with the argument that the carnivores do not respect the lives of animals, because they consume lives also, the difference is that choose a different species does not cause regret the fact that its consumption did not generate suffering its food. But who ensures that the plant being cultivated to be indelicately consumed as well as cow do not want to stay alive?

Meat cause several diseases (many of them originating from agrotóxicos and substances which are placed on plants and livestock feeding rations, hens etc. and other arising from the discharge of epinephrine and aggregate substances of meat at the time of slaughter animals, because of the high level of stress experienced by them), that everybody knows, however its consumption is necessary for the human body and brain (vegetarian rapaziada excuse, but this is a truth) does not mean to say that we need to eat meat tons per year. The overwhelming majority of nutritionists indicate that to achieve near a diet ideally necessary flexibility and balance in food, i.e. eat everything a little and as regards animal material consumption is given more white meat preference being healthier, and encouraged the high dietary intake of fruit, vegetable and vegetable sector. But it seems that when it comes to food vegetarians always more ” “ knows that nutritionists.
I can't imagine a family who lives in the middle of caatinga fan to vegetarianism (of course that may exist, but it is quite complicated), and in most of the year even drinking water and drinking water quality. In large part of the Interior of the initiative the only option for the survival of people use small birds, rodents, lizard (one example is the famous Brazilian Guinea pig), pebas, armadillos, snakes etc. the few remaining plants for human consumption and that can be used as food in the region are very low ralas and nutritional value, is more known by Palm as Chic-Chic nordestinos. Not to mention that as well as the beef industry generates large profits into the pockets of the capitalist malditos of plants is not behind, since some products are very expensive and difficult to access, the higher classes are, and impracticable to an employee to join this diet in your home (not saying that a vegetarian cannot be deprived, but because of low socioeconomic status, as well their diet would be very poor). We cannot indeed or to say that these people are bad for consuming meat. However, we who live structurally more favoured areas, such as urban areas, we have a greater range of options, however nor is it fair in condemn by eat meat, but haven't at least the minimum of conscience to seek to know the origin of meat we eat, if it derives from places that use less aggressive and painful methods in the production process and etc.
There is a food chain and that is undeniable, suddenly all carnivorous animals on the planet have slipped your diet the meat aside, what would happen? a brutal and ecological imbalance quick, and the ironic concurring all exist until meat eaters plants, the famous carnivorous plants. Man is also an animal, what differentiates the other is your logic, some may question the fact that we humans choose between eating meat or not. Then, if the ” “ prefers meat, that eat meat ... and if plant ” “ B, which prefers coma vegetable simple! We need to bear all the main problem is that no side is the reason (frugivoristas), because both consume lives unfortunately. Since meat consumption is inevitable that most people for foodstuffs, the least we can do is carnivores boycotting companies that use cruel means to produce, consume with moderation and eat only what is necessary-don't buy clothes made from skins of animals (there are thousands of clothing options), not to consume products that are tested in experimental animals (medicines, equipment, chemicals etc. human, just pay to use that appears), do not attend events and locations that use animals as a form of entertainment as circuses and etc.
As the man not hunting more food not grown its plants in the backyard (there are exceptions, but you have understood!) and the demand for hose to eat in the world is too large to some extent we are obliged to depend on companies that do this by us, although we have the control and the power of purchasing each one of us buscarmos the best option until one day man chord truth and be manage, and don't rely on more dominant minority that oblige us to make the game of them and tell them “ eating ”. This is one view among so many out there and is always valid hear other views in order to reach a common denominator or at least next, however you can run “ cow, the foot of lettuce! ”.

Arrotado por: Márcio “Pigmeu”